Forum www.fanklub123.fora.pl Strona Główna www.fanklub123.fora.pl
Fanklub zespołu Raz Dwa Trzy
 
 FAQFAQ   SzukajSzukaj   UżytkownicyUżytkownicy   GrupyGrupy     GalerieGalerie   RejestracjaRejestracja 
 ProfilProfil   Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomościZaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości   ZalogujZaloguj 

My true love

 
Napisz nowy temat   Odpowiedz do tematu    Forum www.fanklub123.fora.pl Strona Główna -> Inni wykonawcy w odniesieniu do twórczości zespołu
Zobacz poprzedni temat :: Zobacz następny temat  
Autor Wiadomość
dennisft
Fan



Dołączył: 08 Gru 2010
Posty: 128
Przeczytał: 0 tematów

Ostrzeżeń: 0/3
Skąd: England
Płeć: Kobieta

PostWysłany: Sob 13:10, 07 Maj 2011    Temat postu: My true love

is not a law-abiding people, even though my law-abiding people, my brain is not Kenan points, to love to do deep thinking. However, I think so, we must strive to do things, trying desperately to do, is the largest of their own salvation. A little knowledge is very bad, and only through you, to think, to think, to minimize mistakes.
Some say love is sex plus love, sex is the foundation, and love is the soul. Some also say that love is the two lonely souls, need each other comfort. If sex is a biological life [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], then love is a kind of spiritual life. Even if a thousand species on earth interpretation of love, and no one can make interpretation of its meaning.
fact, we can review the experience of a lifetime, truly a great pleasure to bring their own, I am afraid that is love. But often also love to bring their own greatest distress. Love can make bliss, you can also make people very sad. We love the view, are often concerned with their own experiences. Experience a little better on the more optimistic, that love still exists, is still very cute. Experienced relatively rough, the relatively low rating of love, and even the evaluation of the opposite sex is relatively low. On the opposite sex to feel disappointed. So love [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], perhaps the most vague explanation is the most reasonable explanation.
from the human point of view, in fact sex, love, marriage, among them are linked. Such as manifested in the words of no sex, love and marriage to the question. If there is no gender distinction, of course, love and marriage, there is no reason to exist. Can not be produced. Are built on love and marriage on the basis of sex, which is a common physiological basis for it. Place on the basis of sexual love, in love only on the basis of marriage. , And is the physical life, to follow the pleasure principle. Love is spiritual life, the principle followed is the ideal. Marriage is a social life, to follow the reality principle. Three linked, of course, there is a conflict. With love, especially after the conflict is even greater. Because the fact of direction, may be broad, love, it is to be single-minded. This will conflict. Once you love and love will be with the conflict between the marriage. The conflict of love is actually love and want to conflict. The entanglement of love and desire. Passion and feeling, how the boundaries should be divided. For example [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I am a heterosexual, I have a good impression, in the end is the desire to dominate me, or I really have feelings for her? Same person, others in the pursuit of you, you will have this problem, especially girls, in his pursuit of me in the end he really love me? Or in fact do not love me, just want to get me. Passion and feeling Where is the boundary?
love in the end is what? Love is the instinct, as the physiological basis of sex, no sexual instinct, can not be interested in the opposite sex. It would not be developed into love, so this is a prerequisite. Some people say that both of them, there is no such desire, love can happen. Platonic love is entirely spiritual love. In fact this argument, I think it is a misunderstanding of Plato. Plato had no idea that love. Plato was the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, but also up from a philosophical analysis of the first love of a philosopher. He did not deny that there are two aspects of love. Sensual one hand, there were aspects of the body. On the other hand, there is the spirit, of course, that the spirit he is more noble. He believes that love is the goal, it should be from the sensual love, physical love, rose to the spirit of love. But he does not deny that there carnal love. The first step if it is because of its physiological basis, then the second step is the love further, is an aesthetic emotion. The aesthetic emotion, I think it is very valuable. I think each of us, when they are young, in the time of puberty, there is such a feeling. A world suddenly opened, and a heterosexual world, that time, you will begin to pay attention to the beauty of the opposite sex, girls pay attention to the beauty of boys, girls pay attention to the beauty of boys, began to attract each other. Sensitive to such United States began [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], this time, your mind is really a change occurs, that time you feel the world is so beautiful. Too seductive capacity. Life is really too good. This beauty, in fact, a kind of instinct began to mature, will be accompanied by such a beauty, a strong reflected. At that time, people began a courtship. Beginning will pay attention to, what sort of person they will love.
from a gender attraction to weep and then the two phases of life and death situation dependent. We are constantly in the eternal cycle of love in the world with each other to find. Love and be loved, is our emotional needs. Easily when people care about each other in love, his (her) as a whole. I like the issue discussed with others, have also had several girls asked me The two together in the end is the dominant desire or love. In my opinion, true love, should have so few features:
first, to give rather than possession. Should be a true love for their passion. If it is light to hold, but did not give the passion, I think I am afraid not primarily want to love. Love is very humble. Love is a passion and dedication, love a person, will be irresistible urge to want to do something for her, to make her happy, but definitely not ask for return. The happiness of love in this devotion among his creation in the happiness of being loved. Selfish, lacking the ability to love, because that will never be given if the words of passion, such a person really no capacity to love. I felt they were in love, this mutual giving, there is such a passion to give each other pain, you hurt her, and she hurts you, it is very important. Everyone is like to be pain. I think no one in the world do not want to be strong to the point of pain.
everyone in this world are orphans, lives down, are naked to, are groundless, and the last to go you have to return to the no. When you were a major disaster, without a parent to protect you, how many children the world has a terminal illness, his parents do nothing, in fact, you grow up, is not the same? You grow up, you meet natural disasters, who can protect you? No way, so everyone is actually an orphan, everyone needs someone pain.
there is a problem, I often think, in the end love is important, or important to be loved? For example I love her, she had little love me, do not love me, but I love her, I will make a decision at this time, I did not tell her in the end with the good. If I see is that I love her, I do not really focused on what I was not loved, then I can decide I want her well, but if I feel loved is also very important, I'll think about it slightly, I was not keep up her good go. My view is that both are important, the two are not missing. Of course, we sometimes had to compromise, can not find the person I love, I love her, and she loved me enough no problem, this is no way. However, more choice, there should not be such a compromise. Should also continue to look for.
love and be loved is the man with the emotional needs of the tragedy is that often occurs between the dislocation, love those who do not love yourself, love yourself who has not had the love. In love too easily when they care about being loved, as the right, in all too easy to underestimate the importance of loved loved Shiyou, due, of course. If, in turn, loving without asking for anything, do not care about being grateful for being loved, to love people with dignity, live with tolerance of.
Second: persistent rather than short. Relatively short love, just a momentary infatuation, it may be desire. You may like a man, a look at this person, make you very call, but was soon passed, and tomorrow she'll forget about it, it certainly is not love! Between two people to each other may also have calls, but it is not long passed, you can say that this is the love? A love, it is the survival time, there should be a limit to a minimum, this is the reason for love, a love of quality assurance.
true love, should be specific, rather than multi-directional, while some people love, and then said he was the object of each interaction is very specific, I think purely messing around. Love can not be specific, I think this is the most concentrated expression of love and desire for conflict. We might ask ourselves a question, that is, such as your lover love you while your lover Ye Hao, Ye Hao your spouse, you two are in love, but she loves you, she was not man emotionally, you are not allowed? I think the answer is basically negative, are not allowed. This shows that you request should be single-minded love. If it is not specific, you will feel that he is not love you. But ask a question, you and your lover, you are in love, you can not guarantee that you will not be on the other opposite emotion. If you're honest, your answer is denied, you can not do. This inside there is a conflict, each person actually ask for love oneself is the single-minded, because he believed that love should be single-minded. Emotional boundaries with the love is very vague, and all the world's love is from the beginning of estrus. How can you guarantee that she will not develop into this emotional love? So this thing is not the end to get, so you worry, you do not allow her to others emotionally, I think it is also well understood. We seek love specific, whether you're married, whether you're there lover, I think people still have a natural tendency is to you and heterosexual contact, you have the time and same-sex contacts do not have the kind of pleasant feelings.
was also discussion of a question, that love can not co-existence, on the one hand there are single-minded love, love between us, on the other hand to take care of human nature, everyone can have the kind of emotion to . Of the kind of interest, can be multi-directional, you can have several sexual partners, you can have relations with different people, but we love each other is, can do this? Some time ago discussed this issue with the cousin, she said she could not understand a region has such a thing, married a few people, exchange wife, to experience a different sexual interest.
In fact, many philosophers have discussed, for instance, to discuss the British philosopher Bertrand Russell, in his view can be, he said, people have two instincts, an instinct of love, one is jealous instinct. Instinct of love is brighter, is more positive, jealousy instinct is more negative, so we should go for that instinct to love our jealousy to control my instincts. In fact you might say the opposite sex like people in many, if you two love each other, you like people in other people, she would envy, then we envy each other to control our instincts are, we love each other but none of us do not go management who also freely between each other, talk to the opposite sex for other exchanges. He claims that he called the marriage revolution, he has a book called Anyway, I understand that Russell himself from the four married, got married five times, it seems he has not done successfully. Thus, it is difficult to jealousy instinct restrained. In another example, the French philosopher Sartre, Sartre, Beauvoir and the other women philosophers, the two of them are not married, but they, like almost want to get married because they do not go to church, not the courts how to apply, But they both set the protocol to each other, two people live together forever, forever love, while every person is free, everyone can have other sexual relationships, other sexual partners, they can not interfere, but it must be mutual transparent, you have to tell me I have to tell you. Later, they really do, everyone has their own lover, the results of their friendship to keep down, but both of them, then what is by no means a lover relationship, marriage. No sexual relations. Basically two friends. However, often things for each other's lovers quarrel, so I said, in fact very difficult to co-existence.
Although if it were two different things, one is sex, one is love, I really love you, you really love me, that was it. As for the sex, then how in fact you like with others, in fact, what I have injuries? From the theoretical analysis, is no damage. As long as we do not jealous, then, seems to be no damage. As long as I Xiangde Tong, I get upset, I use a philosopher's approach to the treatment of such things, there was no damage. Theory seems to be the case. Why not work but in fact it? In this issue, we sheng Chinese writers, he explained better, and more specifically to sexual interest and the conflict between love. Can not be reconciled it? His views are not reconciled. He writes: sex between the couple in fact, that love is the most appropriate and most enthusiastic language. Chastity was necessary to protect the language from pollution, in order not to lose it features the kind of affection. And who can warm, can love, love how specific? ! I think that between love and desire, the line should still have.
not romantic love, love between the sexes is the most serious thing. Flirting is easy, love is heavy. Game affair is only the body, at most, or emotional game. However, the love really comes, the soul trembles in fear and ecstasy had. Love is not romantic, because it is the soul thing. True love is the soul and the soul encounters, physical intimacy is only its results. Regardless of the duration is long is short, so that the most solemn encounter, the two sides of the soul will be deeply shocked. On the contrary, in the affair, the soul is not really there, feeling just a little bit sensual little seasoning.
modern there is a trend - to avoid love, love may be too serious, too tired, so do not love, we should of. Now this has become fashionable, there is a saying, that do not want to get married. Shenmeipilao the word, now very popular, but I felt, of course, you may say, the two old people together, there are fatigued, but I think in this way, you frequently change sexual partners, I feel sure that in this way is another Shenmeipilao, you will also not fresh, so I think that we should adopt a serious attitude of love, in fact, you avoid Ye Hao love, not love, Ye Hao, one thing you can not escape, people In a relationship, he was on show, not just their bodies, but their souls, if they have a close relationship, the soul of each other, you try to run away or will you see, your soul is beautiful , or ugly, is rich or poor. The attitude of gender relations, the most that he can divine from the animal inclinations up the ladder, in the end at what height.
Although true love may indeed be the price people pay a piercing, but the harvest will make people be unforgettable. Like ten thousand erotic fiction can not fill the If Adam and Eve no longer have the truth to each other, no longer even count on the truth, they are the ones really being expelled from the Garden of Eden.


Post został pochwalony 0 razy
Powrót do góry
Zobacz profil autora
Wyświetl posty z ostatnich:   
Napisz nowy temat   Odpowiedz do tematu    Forum www.fanklub123.fora.pl Strona Główna -> Inni wykonawcy w odniesieniu do twórczości zespołu Wszystkie czasy w strefie CET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1

Skocz do:  

Nie możesz pisać nowych tematów
Nie możesz odpowiadać w tematach
Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów
Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów
Nie możesz głosować w ankietach


fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group

Chronicles phpBB2 theme by Jakob Persson (http://www.eddingschronicles.com). Stone textures by Patty Herford.
Regulamin